On the use of Scaling Relations in Astronomy

Scaling Relations

In astronomy, indeed in science, there is a dizzying array of constants, equations, and units that all need to be kept straight if we want physics to work. While it is good to know Kepler's 3rd Law for a planetary system, \[ P^2 = \frac{4 \pi^2 a^3}{G\,M_\star} \] we can also use Kepler's original form, which was a scaling relationship, \[ P^2 \sim a^3 .\] The scaling form of Kepler's law works because it is specifically for the solar system in solar system units. It says that for a planet orbiting the sun we know that \(P^2\) scales with \(a^3\). Scaling must always be done with respect to something we know or by using ratios we know. e.g. If we know two objects have some intrinsic size ratio (say two hard spheres), we can determine their relative distance by checking their observed sizes.

Notice that in the scaling version of Kepler's 3rd law the various physical/mathematical constants are no longer present. Both sides of the equation are dimensionless. Scaling relationships are dimensionless equations. The dimensions have been factored out. We can do this by noting following, \[ \frac{G}{4\pi^2} = \frac{a^3}{P^2 \, M_\star} .\] \(\frac{G}{4\pi^2}\) is constant; therefore, this equation is true for any valid combination of \(P\), \(M_\star\), and \(a\). Using the Earth-Sun system, we can plug in values and determine the value of \(\frac{G}{4\pi}\). If we plug in values in cgs, we find that \[ \frac{G}{4\pi^2} = \frac{6.67}{4\pi^2}\times10^{-8}\, { cm^{3}\, g^{-1}\, s^{-2}},\] or we can plug in the values in the more convenient units and get, \[ \frac{G}{4\pi^2} = 1.\ \ \ { AU^{3}\, M_\odot^{-1}\, yr^{-2}}.\] If we use \(AU - M_\odot - yr\) units, instead of \(cm - g - s\) units, we can write, \[P^2 = a^3\,M^{-1} .\] This can also be written, as is often done in astronomy to prevent ambiguity, since we primarily use cgs, as: \[ \left(\!\frac{P}{yr}\!\right)^2 = \left(\!\frac{a}{AU}\!\right)^3\left(\!\frac{M}{M_\odot}\!\right)^{-1} .\] This format tells the reader exactly what units to use. The point is, once you derive a squiggle \(\sim\) equation, use it. Normalize it to quantities you know. This will make the arithmetic much simpler.

Application to stellar wobble

Let's apply to this something else very useful - determining the wobble velocity of a star due to a planet. We know that the velocity semi-amplitude of a star, \(K\), due to a planet is related to the planet's orbital velocity (assume circular, \(e=0\)) by \[ K = \frac{m_p}{M_\star}v_p \] Substituting in for the velocity, in cgs units, \[ K = m_p\, (2\pi\, G)^{1/3}\, M_\star^{-2/3}\, P^{-1/3} .\] Now you can solve this every time and plug in constants, but we know that Jupiter causes the sun to wobble with \(K = 12.5~m/s\), so \[ K \sim m_p\, M_\star^{-2/3} \, P^{-1/3}\] \[ K =12.5\, m/s\ \left(\!\frac{m_p}{M_{Jup}}\!\right)\, \left(\!\frac{M}{M_\odot}\!\right)^{-2/3}\, \left(\frac{P}{12\,yr}\right)^{-1/3} \] Exoplanets are often presented in Jupiter masses, and stellar masses are almost always presented in solar masses, so having an equation in these units makes sense.

Some good numbers to remember, \[ M_\odot \approx 1050\, M_{Jup} \] \[ M_{Jup} \approx 300\, M_\oplus \] \[ 1.\ AU \approx 215\, R_\odot \] \[ R_\odot \approx 10\, R_{Jup} \] \[ R_{Jup} \approx 10\, R_\oplus \]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Quick Look at Spherical Coordinates

Image
Because astronomy works on the Celestial Sphere, spherical coordinates play a very important role in astronomy. Most of the time we can ignore the intricacies of physics in 3-dimensions and work in a 2D far-field regime. (The far-field regime is just fancy speak for "small-angles"). However, it can be useful to understand why spherical coordinates are they way they are. Here, we will quickly derive the spherical differential volume element. Differential, just means vanishingly small. To let the cat out of the bag, the spherical differential volume element is, \[ dV = r^2 \sin{\theta}\, dr\, d\theta \, d\phi .\] The figure above shows the coordinate system we will be working with. This form is commonly used in astronomy, and also in some physics. However, it is different from the way mathematicians define it. In mathematics the \(\theta\) and the \(\phi\) are often switched. The astronomy convention is the more commonly used one in physics and astronomy (sorry mathematica...
Keep reading

Coding and the Interwebs

Image
If there is one thing you should know about learning to code, it is that the internet is your friend . Learning how to find what you need on the internet is an important skill to learn. A lot of the skill comes with time, but there are a few things that can get you going. Someone has had the same problem you are having. There is an answer. Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange are miracles of the internet. Don't worry which is which unless you want to Occam's Razor - Try the simplest solution first, but avoid hackey solutions. How to ask a good question* A good format to follow for asking Google a question is language what you want to do Say I am working on some C++ code, and I want to read in columns from a file. Suppose these have multiple data types, some are strings while others are integers. Example: Alice 1 10 1e3 Bob 2 12 2e3 I would ask C++ how do I read in columns with multiple data types from a file . While this is doable, a Google search sh...
Keep reading

Astrobites

Image
Astrobites is an astro-ph digest developed by Harvard graduates students which now has an international author roll. What is astrobites ? In their own words, Astrobites is a daily astrophysical literature journal written by graduate students in astronomy. Our goal is to present one interesting paper per day in a brief format that is accessible to undergraduate students in the physical sciences who are interested in active research. Essentially, Astrobites takes new research in astronomy and astrophysics and digests it into something approachable. With posts written by graduate students from around the globe, it provides an excellent introduction to technical writing that is understandable for the lay person, yet still scientifically interesting to the expert. Check out some of the posts by the following authors: John Johnson Ben Cook Ben Montet Elisabeth Newton (co-founder) Chris Feasi (co-founder)
Keep reading